Recently I have been trying to improve my pedigree of the Rochford family of Boston, Lincolnshire. The published sources and pedigrees do not appear to match up with primary documents such as Patent Rolls, Close Rolls, etc. in many cases.
The starting point of my researches was to determine, who Saier de Rochford was? was he one man or two, as some sources suggest, who were his children and who were his heirs.The results of my researches are summarized below:
Sir Saier de Rochford
Saier
de Rochford, knight, of Fenn near Boston, Lincolnshire was the son and heir of
Sir Ralph de Rochford, knight, by Agnes daughter of Sir Richard de Draycote (d.
c. 1268) of Draycote, Staffordshire by his second unknown wife. He was born before
1295 as he was an adult in 1316. He had two brothers, John and Thomas who were
alive in 1335. He married firstly, before November 1320, Elizabeth, daughter of Peter de Limesy, heiress of
the manor of Arley in Warwickshire. He married secondly before May 1348, Joan, daughter of Sir Roger
Hillary, knight, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. By his first wife Elizabeth,
he had two sons; John and Ralph, and by his second wife he had another son John
and a son Edmund who occurs in 1368. He died at a great age after August 1372.
On
16 April 1316, an inquisition after the death of Theobald de Gayton, to clarify
the ownership of two-thirds of the manor of La Grave (Grove Park) in Budbrooke,
Warwickshire, found that Theobald held it for life, and it ought to remain to
Saier son and heir of Ralph de Rochford by virtue of a fine levied at Lincoln
in 1284 between Theobald de Neville and Ralph de Rochford, Saier’s father.[1] In
June 1316 the escheator was ordered to give Saier possession of the manor.[2] In
November 1320, Saier de Rochford and Elizabeth his wife were ordered to be
present in Chancery for a further inquisition into the manor of La Grave. This
inquisition in April 1322, found that the manor should belong to Scholastica,
widow of Godfrey de Meaux, sister of Theobald de Gayton.[3] On
12 May 1354, Saier son and heir of Ralph de Rocheford, knight released to John
de Hastang, knight, of all his right and claim in the manor of la Grave with
its appurtenances, in the county of Warwick.[4]
In
Michaelmas Term 1335, Thomas son of Ralph de Rochford, brother of John de
Rochford, sued Saier de Rochford, knight, his brother, for a third of the manor
of Fenn in Boston, Skirbeck and Fishtoft, near Freiston, as his share of the
inheritance of Ralph de Rocheford, as the manor was held of the honour of
Richmond and the other lands partly of the soke of Richmond, which were divisible
amongst male heirs (under Breton law).[5]
Saier
de Rochford married secondly, before May 1348, Joan, daughter of Sir Roger
Hillary, knight, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. On 18 May 1348, Saier de
Rochford and Joan his wife were parties to a fine concerning land and rents in Benington,
Fishtoft, Skirbeck and Boston, Lincolnshire, Walpole, Norfolk and Braunston in
Rutland.[7] In
1349-50 Saier de Rochford and Joan his wife bought property in Walpole, Norfolk
from William Ivet of Walpole and Agnes his wife.[8] In
1355, Sir Saier de Rochford granted land in Walpole, and other places in
Norfolk, to his son Sir Ralph de Rochford and Maud his wife.[9] On
6 October 1368, by a fine at Westminster, Saier de Rochford and Edmund his son
purchased land in North and South Stoke, Lincolnshire (Stoke Rochford).[10]
As
a young man, Saier de Rochford was evidently a rebel. In May 1320, Roger de
Swinnerton complained that Saier de Rochford, with others, had attacked him at
his manor of Acton in Staffordshire.[11]
In January 1322, the sheriff of Warwickshire was ordered to take into the
king’s hand, the land, goods and chattels of Saier de Rochford and others. [12]
Saier de Rochford evidently supported the rebels who fought against Edward II
at the battle of Boroughbridge in March 1322, although there is no evidence
that he fought there. In July 1322, he made a fine of 200 marks to have
restoration of his lands. [13]
On 10 June 1323, his lands in Warwickshire and Lincolnshire were restored to
him.[14] He
was knighted, with many others, on 20 January 1327, shortly before the coronation
of king Edward III. [15] On
4 June 1327, he was going to Scotland in the company of John de Hotham, bishop
of Ely, who was at that time Chancellor.[16]
On
8 October 1337, Saier de Rochford was appointed as one of the collectors of a
tenth and a fifteenth in the parts of Holand, Lincolnshire.[17]
On 25 February 1339, Saier de Rocheford was keeper of the king's peace in
Holand, Lincolnshire.[18]
On 3 April 1339 he had respite from the accounts which he was bound to render
at the Exchequer for the time when he was appointed collector of the tenth and
fifteenth and scutage in the parts of Holand, Lincolnshire, and for the time
when he was appointed to take wool for the king's use in that county and for
other accounts, as he was about to set out in the king's service at sea in the
company of William Trussell, admiral of the fleet, for the defence of the
realm.[19]
On 22 November 1343, Saier de Rochford was appointed sheriff of Lincolnshire
and escheator in Lincolnshire and Rutland, until November 1345.[20] On
22 January 1347, he was a collector of an aid in Holand, Lincolnshire.[21]
In June 1347 he was with Laurence de Hastings, Earl of Pembroke’s forces at the
siege of Calais.[22] On 1 October 1348, he was
again appointed as sheriff of Lincolnshire and escheator in Lincolnshire and Rutland.[23] He
retained these offices until February 1355, when he was already over 60 years
old.[24]
On
27 July 1359, he was one of those appointed to escort John, king of France, who
had been captured at the battle of Poitiers, from Hereford castle and imprison
him in Somerton castle in Lincolnshire.[25]
On 2 March 1360, he was one of those ordered to move the king of France from
Somerton castle to Berkhamstead castle in Hertfordshire.[26]
Saier
de Rochford last occurs in official records on 25 August 1372, when he was
appointed to a commission of the peace and of oyer and terminer in the parts of
Kesteven, Lincolnshire.[27]
[1] Calendar
of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 5, Edward II (1908), 382, No. 602.
[2] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward II, vol. 2: 1313-1318 (1893), 296.
[3] Calendar
of Inquisitions Post Mortem, Vol. 6, Edward II (1910), 169-71, No. 287.
[4] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 10: 1354-1360 (1908), 69.
[5] G. Wrottesley, Pedigrees
from the Plea Rolls (London, 1905), 27.
[7] Feet
of Fines: CP 25/1/287/43, number 418.
[8] Walter
Rye, ed., A Short Calendar of the Feet of Fines for Norfolk, part 2 (1886),
322, No. 809.
[9] Walter
Rye, ed., A Short Calendar of the Feet of Fines for Norfolk, part 2 (1886),
328, No. 917.
[10] Feet
of Fines: CP 25/1/141/131, number 13.
[11] Calendar
of Patent Rolls, Edward II, vol. 3: 1317-1321 (1903), 484.
[12] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 3, 1319-1327 (1912), 90.
[13] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 3 1319-1327 (1912), 157.
[14] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward II, vol. 3: 1318-1323 (1895), 657.
[15] William A. Shaw, The Knights
of England : A Complete Record from the Earliest Time to the Present Day of the
Knights of All the Orders of Chivalry in England, Scotland, and Ireland, and of
Knights Bachelors, vol. 1, 1906, 124.
[16] Simpson and Galbraith, Calendar
of Documents Relating to Scotland, 5 (Supplementary):370.
[17] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 5, Edward III: 1337-1347 (1915), 51.
[18] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 5: 1339-1341 (1901), 101.
[19] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 5: 1339-1341 (1901), 112.
[20] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 5, Edward III: 1337-1347 (1915), 349, 351, 445-6.
[21] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 5, Edward III: 1337-1347 (1915), 493.
[22] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 6, Edward III: 1347-1356 (1921), 22.
[23] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 6, Edward III: 1347-1356 (1921), 84-5.
[24] Calendar
of Fine Rolls, vol. 6, Edward III: 1347-1356 (1921), 419.
[25] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 10, 1354-1360 (1908), 634.
[26] Calendar
of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 11, 1360-1364 (1909), 11.
[27] Calendar
of Patent Rolls, Edward III, vol. 15: 1370-1374 (1914), 240.
Sir John Rochford the Elder
Sir John de Rochford, knight, of Lincolnshire, eldest son of Sir Saier de Rochford, knight, of Fenn near Boston, Lincolnshire by his first wife Elizabeth de Limesy, was probably born about 1325. He was knighted before 1350. The name of his first wife is unknown. He married secondly after 1366, Beatrice, who was probably Beatrice de Hotham, daughter of Sir John de Hotham of Scorborough (d. c. 1370) and widow of Sir Robert Hansard (d. 1366), He died in 1392 or 1393. He was succeeded by his son Sir Ralph Rochford, knight, who died shortly before 19 May 1440.
Sir John de Rochford and his brother Sir Ralph were both knighted before 1350 when they were members of the guild of Corpus Christi in Boston.[1] John was the eldest son, since he inherited his father’s property in Lincolnshire and his mother’s manor of Arley in Warwickshire.
By a fine at Westminster dated 13 October 1358, he purchased property in Fishtoft (Toft) in Lincolnshire.[2] On 18 January 1368, a commission of oyer and terminer was ordered to investigate the complaint by John de Rocheford, knight, that when he was under the king’s protection, malefactors had broken his close at Skirbeck, Lincolnshire, burned his houses there, taken his goods, and assaulted, wounded and imprisoned his men and servants.[3]
On 13 June 1373, Sir John de Rocheford and Beatrice his wife, were holding the manor of South Kelsey in Lincolnshire with reversion to Robert Hansard and his heirs after the death of Beatrice.[4] Beatrice was probably the widow of Sir Robert Hansard of Walworth, Durham, Blacktoft, Yorkshire and South Kelsey, Lincolnshire, who died before May 1366.
He was one of the knights of the shire for Lincolnshire at the last Parliament of Edward III, held in Westminster between January and March 1377.[5] In March 1377, he was appointed to commissions of wallis et fossatis and a commission of the peace in Holand, Lincolnshire.[6] In July 1377, he was a commissioner of array in Holand.[7] In March 1382, he was on a commission of the peace in Lincolnshire.[8] In the same month he was on a commission to investigate a shipwreck together with his younger brother John.[9]
John de Rochford appears on numerous commissions in Lincolnshire between 1382 and 1392, and it is not easy to distinguish him from his younger brother, but as his brother was not knighted until late 1399, some records can be identified with certainty. He was on a commission in 29 May 1392 to investigate negligent chantry priests, together with John de Rochford the younger.[10] He appears in no further official records, so he probably died in 1392 or 1393. He was definitely dead before May 1396, when the inquisition post mortem for Warwickshire of Sir Roger Corbet of Leigh, Shropshire found that he died on 2 March 1381, holding one third of the manor of Arley, Warwickshire of John Rochford, knight. After Roger’s death, Sir John Rochford and Ralph his son and heir, had taken the issues of the property by reason of the minority of Roger Corbet’s heir. [11]
Sources:
[1] Pishey Thompson, The History and Antiquities of Boston (Boston, 1856), 117.
[2] Feet of Fines: CP 25/1/140/122, number 32.
[3] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, vol. 14: 1367-1370 (1913), 67.
[4] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 13, 1369-1374 (1911), 580.
[5] Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III, vol. 14: 1374-1377 (1913), 536.
[6] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, vol. 16: 1374-1377 (11916), 485, 490.
[7] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 1: 1377-1381 (1895), 38.
[8] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 140.
[9] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 136.
[10] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5: 1391-1396 (1905), 87.
[11] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 17, Richard II (1988), No. 617.
Sir John Rochford, the Younger
Sir John de Rochford, knight, of Boston, Lincolnshire, younger son of Sir Saier de Rochford, knight, of Fenn (or Rochford Tower in Boston), Lincolnshire by his third wife Joan, daughter of Roger Hillary, knight, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas was probably born about 1352. In 1375 or 1376 he married Alice. He was knighted in October or November 1399. [1] He died on 13 December 1410,[2] leaving three daughters as his heirs.
There were two Sir John de Rochfords, an elder and a younger. The elder, who died about 1392 or 1393 was the eldest son of Sir Saier de Rochford by his first wife, Elizabeth. Both Johns appear on commissions in Lincolnshire, starting early in the reign of Richard II, but it is difficult to tell them apart. The younger John is usually referred to as “junior,” “the younger,” or “of Boston (St. Botolph).” The first definite record for the younger John is on 10 November 1379 when “John son of Saier de Rocheford the younger” was a member of a commission to enquire into a robbery at the house of the Friars Preachers in Boston. [3]
In 1376-7, John Rochford, junior and Alice his wife were members of the guild of Corpus Christi in Boston. [4] In 1381-2, John son of Saier de Rochford, junior, and Alice his wife, were granted the manor of Bergholt in Suffolk by his uncle, Roger Hillary and Margaret his wife. [5] In February 1388, Alice wife of John de Rochford was executrix of the will of Richard de Neuton of Boston, who may have been a relative. [6] In September 1403, John Rochford (John son of Saier, son of Joan, sister of Roger) was found to be one of the heirs of his uncle Roger Hillary who died without heirs of his body on 13 June 1400. [7] He inherited land in Snarestone and Barrow-on-Soar, Leicestershire, the manor of Stretton on Fosse, Warwickshire and land in Staffordshire.
John de Rochford was Alderman of the Corpus Christi guild in Boston from 1381 to 1386, 1391 to 1394, 1397 to 1399, and in 1409. [8] In February 1390, with others, he alienated land to the abbey of Barlings, where he and his wife were later buried. [9] In 1392, John de Rochford, with others was given licence to found another religious guild in Boston, which was to be dedicated to God and the Virgin and be supported out of a landed income of £10 annually. [10] In April 1397, John Rochford, donsel, nobleman, and Alice his wife, noble woman had Papal indulgences to choose a confessor and to have a portable altar. [11]
John de Rochford the younger appears on numerous commissions in Lincolnshire and elsewhere during the reigns of Richard II and Henry IV:
8 March 1382 (commission of peace) [12], 15 March 1382 (shipwreck) [13], 20 December 1382 (commission of peace) [14], 21 December 1382 (commission of peace) [15], 23 November 1383 (robbery at Fillingham) [16], 26 April 1385 (commission of array) [17], 24 November 1385 (to arrest goods of Prussian merchants) [18], 27 July 1386, (commission de wallis et fossatis) [19], 26 November 1386 (boundary commission) [20], 2 December 1387 (commission of peace) [21], 24 May 1388 (dispute concerning the manor of Denver, Norfolk) [22], 16 February 1390 (commission de wallis et fossatis) [23], 10 February 1392 (counterfeiting of the great seal) [24], 29 May 1392 (negligent chantry priests) [25], 27 July 1393 (weights and measures) [26], 29 May 1394 (commission de wallis et fossatis) [27], 14 December 1397 (attack on the bishop of Lincoln’s men) [28], 6 February 1398 (custody of the goods of the vicar of Sibsey) [29], 12 November 1399, (commission de wallis et fossatis) [30], 18 November 1399 (commission of the peace) [31], 18 December 1399 (commission of array) [32], 12 February 1400 (commission de wallis et fossatis) [33], 25 November 1400 (commission of oyer and terminer) [34], 16 May 1401 (commission of the peace) [35], 11 May 1402 (commission to proclaim the King’s intention to rule justly) [36], 7 August 1402 (commission of array) [37], 8 November 1402 (market and fair at Burgh-le-Marsh) [38], 27 July 1403 (commission of array) [39], 9 September 1403 (commission of array) [40], 24 March 1404 (collector of a tax in the Isle of Ely) [41], 31 March 1405 (commissioner to raise a loan in Lincolnshire) [42], 14 June 1405 (to provide supplies to the king’s army) [43], 21 November 1405 (inspect indictments) [44], 3 July 1409 (commission de wallis et fossatis) [45], 8 March 1410 (commission de wallis et fossatis) [46], 1 November 1410 (commission de wallis et fossatis) [47],
John de Rochford, presumably the younger, was elected as Mayor of Boston on 26 July 1386.[48] He was appointed sheriff of Lincolnshire on 20 October 1391 [49] until 18 October 1392. He was one of the knights of the shire for Lincolnshire at the Parliament held at Westminster in November and December 1390, [50] the Parliament held at Westminster in January and February 1394, [51] and the Parliament which started at Westminster in September 1397.[52] He was also knight of the shire for Lincolnshire in the first Parliament of Henry IV in October-November 1399.[53] On 18 February 1400, he was granted, for life, the stewardship of the forfeited lands of the Earl of Kent in Lincolnshire. [54] He was sheriff of Lincolnshire on 24 November 1400[55] until 8 November 1401. In July 1401, he was summoned to a meeting of the Privy Council as one of six knights and esquires from Lincolnshire.[56] On 17 August 1401, he was appointed, for life, by the Bishop of Ely, as his constable of Wisbech castle in Cambridgeshire.[57] On 30 March 1403, with his nephew Sir Ralph Rochford, he was granted the keeping of the lands of Sir James Roos until the full age of his heir Robert.[58] He was one of the knights of the shire for Cambridgeshire in the Parliament of October 1407.[59] He was again appointed sheriff of Lincolnshire on 4 November 1409[60] until 29 November 1410.
In his will, drawn up on 20 October 1410 at Lincoln, John Rochford desired burial at Barlings Abbey, Lincolnshire, beside his wife Alice; he left numerous bequests to Lincoln Cathedral and other churches, but there is no mention of descendants. His executor John Southam, archdeacon of Oxford, was entrusted with his personal legacies. The will was proved on 14 December 1410.[61]
Sir John Rochford was succeeded by three daughters:
- - Margaret, (died after 1443) married, before September 1394, Frederick son of Sir Philip Tilney (died before 1412). On 29 September 1394, John de Rochford of St. Botolph was granted the manor of Thetford, Cambridgeshire at a rental of 40 marks per year for 8 years, by feoffees of Sir Philip Tilney. The rent was to be reduced by £10 yearly if John de Rochford maintained Frederick, son of Sir Philip Tilney and Margaret his wife, John’s daughter.[62] Margaret was still living on 10 February 1443 when she granted the manor of Thetford to Frederick, son of Philip Tilney, clerk, and his wife Elizabeth, daughter of Laurence Cheyne, esquire, and the heirs of their bodies.[63]
- - Joan, (died before 1422) first wife of Sir Robert Roos of Gedney (died 30 September 1441). Their only daughter Margaret, born about 1413, was co-heir of her father in 1441.[64]
- - Alice, married William Gibthorpe, esquire of Thorpe, Lincolnshire, son of Sir William Gibthorpe (died before 1422). They had one son John, who died before 1421, leaving an infant daughter Elizabeth. Alice may have been living in November 1437.[65]
Sources:
[1] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 164.
[2] Pishey Thompson, The History and Antiquities of Boston (Boston, 1856), 123.
[3] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 1: 1377-1381 (1895), 421.
[4] Pishey Thompson, The History and Antiquities of Boston (Boston, 1856), 117.
[5] Walter Rye, ed., A Calendar of the Feet of Fines for Suffolk (1900), 255.
[6] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 3: 1385-1389 (1900), 418.
[7] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 18, Henry IV (1987), Nos. 772-774.
[8] Pishey Thompson, The History and Antiquities of Boston (Boston, 1856), 117-8.
[9] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 4: 1388-1392 (1902), 193.
[10] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5: 1391-1396 (1905), 192.
[11] Calendar of Papal Registers Relating to Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 5, 1398-1404 (1904), 127, 140.
[12] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 140.
[13] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 136.
[14] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 254.
[15] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 245.
[16] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 357.
[17] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 2: 1381-1385 (1897), 591.
[18] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 3: 1385-1389 (1900), 61.
[19] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 3: 1385-1389 (1900), 257.
[20] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 3: 1385-1389 (1900), 263.
[21] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 3: 1385-1389 (1900), 385.
[22] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 3: 1385-1389 (1900), 473.
[23] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 4: 1388-1392 (1902), 215.
[24] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5: 1391-1396 (1905), 85.
[25] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5: 1391-1396 (1905), 87.
[26] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5: 1391-1396 (1905), 356.
[27] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5: 1391-1396 (1905), 430.
[28] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Richard II, vol. 6: 1396-1399 (1909), 310.
[29] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 11, Richard II: 1391-1399 (1929), 249.
[30] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 164.
[31] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 560.
[32] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 210.
[33] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 216.
[34] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 414.
[35] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 560.
[36] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 2: 1401-1405 (1905), 129.
[37] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 2: 1401-1405 (1905), 138.
[38] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 2: 1401-1405 (1905), 198.
[39] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 2: 1401-1405 (1905), 293.
[40] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 2: 1401-1405 (1905), 289.
[41] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 12, Henry IV: 1399-1405 (1931), 259.
[42] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 12, Henry IV: 1399-1405 (1931), 319.
[43] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 3: 1405-1408 (1907), 30.
[44] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 3: 1405-1408 (1907), 148.
[45] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 4: 1408-1413 (1909), 66.
[46] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 4: 1408-1413 (1909), 181.
[47] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 4: 1408-1413 (1909), 310.
[48] Chancery: Certificates of Statute Merchant and Statute Staple, C 241/175/61A.
[49] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 11, Richard II: 1391-1399 (1929), 13.
[50] Calendar of Close Rolls, Richard II, vol. 4: 1389-1392 (1922), 305.
[51] Calendar of Close Rolls, Richard II, vol. 5, 1392-1396 (1925), 277.
[52] Calendar of Close Rolls, Richard II, vol. 6, 1396-1399 (1927), 302.
[53] Calendar of Close Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1, 1399-1402 (1927), 107.
[54] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 201.
[55] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 12, Henry IV: 1399-1405 (1931), 94.
[56] Nicholas Harris Nicolas, Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy Council of England, vol. 1 (London, 1834), 160.
[57] Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 1: 1399-1401 (1903), 534.
[58] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 12, Henry IV: 1399-1405 (1931), 204.
[59] Calendar of Close Rolls, Henry IV, vol. 3, 1405-1409 (1931), 398.
[60] Calendar of Fine Rolls, vol. 13, Henry IV: 1405-1413 (1933), 167.
[61] Margaret Archer, ed., The Register of Philip Repingdon, vol. 2, Lincoln Record Society, 58 (1963), 212.
[62] Nottinghamshire Archives, Portland of Welbeck (4th Deposit): Estate Papers, DD/4P/4/15.
[63] Nottinghamshire Archives, Portland of Welbeck (4th Deposit): Estate Papers, DD/4P/4/21.
[64] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 25, 16-20 Henry VI:1437-1442 (2009), No. 590.
[65] Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem, vol. 24, 11-15 Henry VI: 1432-1437 (2010), No. 545.
Hi John - I can't say how happy I was to stumble on this post. This is a great write-up.
ReplyDeleteI have been researching the Rochfords on and off for perhaps nine years - and I have recently been putting the finishing touches to a book about them. You can read it online at https://therochfords.wordpress.com/
Your account mostly agrees with mine - that there was one Sir Sayer de Rochford who had two sons named John, and so on. I think there are a few small differences, so I would be really interested to explore them.
Please do you make contact - you can do so through my site. It would be great to hear from you.
Best,
Nick.
This is so helpful to me, thanks very much. My 22nd GG on my mom's side. I hail from Baltimore, MD, US. Thanks again!
ReplyDeleteHi John, I too agree largely with your deductions, but I would be grateful if you would share your reasons for assuming a first wife for Saer who was Elizabeth Limesy. Just in case my email address doesn't make itself apparent, it is beewg1415@hotmail.com, and my name is Bee. Many thanks, B
ReplyDelete